"Ipaglaban mo nang puspusan ang pananampalataya. Panghawakan mong mabuti ang buhay na walang hanggan, dahil diyan ka tinawag ng Diyos nang ipahayag mo sa harap ng maraming saksi ang iyong pananalig kay Cristo." I Tim. 6:12

January 28, 2013

Historically and biblically, the Catholic Church cannot trace its origin back to the 1st century

FACTS:

Historically, the Catholic Church cannot trace its origin back to the 1st century.

Biblically, the Catholic Church cannot trace its origin back to the 1st century.

The doctrines and practices of the Catholic Church cannot trace its origin back to the doctrines and practices of the 1st century church of Christ.

The doctrines and practices of the Catholic Church cannot trace its origin back to the teachings in the bible.


______________________________


Catholics claim that their church is the only Christian church that can trace its roots back to the first century but i doubt it, because their claim is very impossible for them to prove especially if we will compare their doctrines, practices and beliefs to that of the 1st century church of Christ. Everything in the Catholic Church is far different to the church that was established by Christ, and i am 100% sure that the Catholic Church is not the church of Christ not because i am a non catholic but because ive examine basic facts about the history of the Catholic Church and some of its doctrines and practices.

We do not deny that the Catholic Church in the beginning was the church of Christ. But saying that the Catholic Church is the "church of Christ" based on its teachings (which is very important because those are the things that will bring us salvation) is very hard to accept.

How about you, will you accept that the 1st century church of Christ is the Catholic Church if youve learned that there are so many new doctrines and practices invented by the Catholics after the death of the apostles? I mean, these:

200 ADImmersion of infants who are dying, but considered sinless. (Tertullian V.12)
250 ADNorth Africa region is first to practice infant baptism and reduced the age of baptism from minors to all newborns. This is opposed by other regions.
257 ADBaptism by sprinkling for adults instead of immersion first used as an exception for those on sick beds, but it caused great dispute.
300 ADPrayers for the dead
320 ADSpecial dress code of the clergy in worship
325 ADAt the general council of Nice, 325, it was proposed indeed, probably by the Western bishop Hosius, to forbid entirely the marriage of priests; but the motion met with strong opposition, and was rejected.
325 ADThe date for Easter was set.
379 ADPraying to Mary & Saints. (prayers of Ephraim Syrus)
385 ADIn the West, the first prohibition of clerical marriage, which laid claim to universal ecclesiastical authority, proceeded in 385 from the Roman church in the form of a decretal letter of the bishop Siricius to Himerius, bishop of Tarragona in Spain.
389 ADMariolatry begins with Gregory Nazianzen, who mentions in a eulogy, how Justina had besought the virgin Mary to protect her virginity.
400 ADImpossibility of apostasy or once saved always saved, (Augustine XII.9)
416 ADInfant baptism by immersion commanded of all infants (Council Of Mela, Austin was the principal director)
430 ADExhalation of Virgin Mary: "Mother of God" first applied by the Council of Ephesus
502 ADSpecial dress code of the Clergy all the time.
500 ADThe "Habit" of Nuns (Black gowns with white tunics)
519 ADLent
526 ADExtreme Unction
593 ADThe Doctrine of Purgatory popularized from the Apocrypha by Gregory the Great
600 ADFirst use of Latin in worship (Gregory I)
Beginning of the Orthodox/Roman Catholic church as we know it today in its present organization.
607 AD Click to View First Pope: Boniface III is the first person to take the title of "universal Bishop" by decree of Emperor Phocas.
608 ADPope Boniface IV. turns the Pantheon in Rome into a temple of Mary ad martyres: the pagan Olympus into a Christian heaven of gods.
670 ADInstrumental music: first organ by Pope Vitalian
709 AD Kissing of Pope Constantine's feet
753 ADBaptism by sprinkling for those on sick beds officially accepted.
787 ADWorship of icons and statue approved (2nd council of Nicea)
787 ADRome (Latin) and Constantinople (Greek) part ways and begin the drift towards complete split, resulting in two denominations emerging in 1054 AD.
965 ADBaptism of bells instituted by Pope John XIII
850 AD Burning of Holy Candles
995 ADCanonization of dead saints, first by Pope John XV
998 ADGood Friday: fish only and the eating-red meat forbidden
1009 ADHoly water
1022 ADPenance
1054 ADRoman Catholic church breaks away from the Orthodox church
1054 ADRoman Catholics officially embrace instrumental music, Orthodox reject instrumental music down to the present time.
1079 ADCelibacy enforced for priests, bishops, presbyters (Pope Gregory VII)
1090 ADRosary beads: invented by Peter the Hermit
1095 ADInstrumental music
1190 ADSale of Indulgences or "tickets to sin" (punishment of sin removed)
1215 ADTransubstantiation by Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council
1215 ADAuricular Confession of sins to priests instituted by Pope Innocent III, (Lateran Council)
1215 ADMass a Sacrifice of Christ
1217 ADAdoration and Elevation of Host: ie. communion bread (Pope Honrius III)
1230 ADRinging bells at Mass
1251 ADThe Scapular, the brown cloak worn by monks invented by Simon Stock
1268 ADPriestly power of absolution
1311 ADBaptism by sprinkling accepted as the universal standard instead of immersion for all, not just the sick. (Council of Ravenna)
1414 ADLaity no longer offered Lord's cup at communion (Council of Constance)
1439 ADPurgatory a dogma by the Council of Florence (see 593 AD)
1439 ADDoctrine of Seven Sacraments affirmed
1480 ADThe Inquisition (of Spain)
1495 ADPapal control of marriage rights
1534 ADOrder of Jesuits founded by Loyola
1545 ADMan-made tradition of church made equal to Bible (Council of Trent)
1545 ADApocryphal books added to Bible (Council of Trent)
1546 ADJustification by human works of merit
1546 ADMass universally said in Latin (see 600 AD)
1547 ADConfirmation
1560 ADPersonal opinions of Pope Pius IV imposed as the official creed
1864 ADSyllabus Errorum [Syllabus of Errors] proclaimed that "Catholic countries" could not tolerate other religions, (no freedom of religion), conscience, separation of church and State condemned, asserted the Pope's temporal authority over all civil rulers (Ratified by Pope Pius IX and Vatican Council) condemned
1870 ADInfallibility of Pope (Vatican council)
1908 AD All Catholics should be christened into the church
1930 ADPublic Schools condemned by Pope Pius XII (see 1864 AD)
1950 ADSinners prayer, invented by Billy Sunday and made popular by Billy Graham. (Some Catholics now use this)
1950 AD Assumption of the body of the Virgin Mary into heaven shortly after her death. (Pope Pius XII)
1954 ADImmaculate conception of Mary proclaimed by Pope Pius XII
1995 AD The use of girls in the traditional alter boy duties
1996 ADCatholics can believe in Evolution (Pope John Paul II)

source: bible.ca

I become enlightened in some things when i read about the origin of the Catholic Church by gotquestions.org:

Question: "What is the origin of the Catholic Church?"

Answer:
The Roman Catholic Church contends that its origin is the death, resurrection, and ascension of Jesus Christ in approximately A.D. 30. The Catholic Church proclaims itself to be the church that Jesus Christ died for, the church that was established and built by the apostles. Is that the true origin of the Catholic Church? On the contrary. Even a cursory reading of the New Testament will reveal that the Catholic Church does not have its origin in the teachings of Jesus or His apostles. In the New Testament, there is no mention of the papacy, worship/adoration of Mary (or the immaculate conception of Mary, the perpetual virginity of Mary, the assumption of Mary, or Mary as co-redemptrix and mediatrix), petitioning saints in heaven for their prayers, apostolic succession, the ordinances of the church functioning as sacraments, infant baptism, confession of sin to a priest, purgatory, indulgences, or the equal authority of church tradition and Scripture. So, if the origin of the Catholic Church is not in the teachings of Jesus and His apostles, as recorded in the New Testament, what is the true origin of the Catholic Church?

For the first 280 years of Christian history, Christianity was banned by the Roman Empire, and Christians were terribly persecuted. This changed after the “conversion” of the Roman Emperor Constantine. Constantine “legalized” Christianity with the Edict of Milan in A.D. 313. Later, in A.D. 325, Constantine called the Council of Nicea in an attempt to unify Christianity. Constantine envisioned Christianity as a religion that could unite the Roman Empire, which at that time was beginning to fragment and divide. While this may have seemed to be a positive development for the Christian church, the results were anything but positive. Just as Constantine refused to fully embrace the Christian faith, but continued many of his pagan beliefs and practices, so the Christian church that Constantine promoted was a mixture of true Christianity and Roman paganism.

Constantine found that with the Roman Empire being so vast, expansive, and diverse, not everyone would agree to forsake his or her religious beliefs to embrace Christianity. So, Constantine allowed, and even promoted, the “Christianization” of pagan beliefs. Completely pagan and utterly unbiblical beliefs were given new “Christian” identities. Some clear examples of this are as follows:

(1) The Cult of Isis, an Egyptian mother-goddess religion, was absorbed into Christianity by replacing Isis with Mary. Many of the titles that were used for Isis, such as “Queen of Heaven,” “Mother of God,” and theotokos (“God-bearer”) were attached to Mary. Mary was given an exalted role in the Christian faith, far beyond what the Bible ascribes to her, in order to attract Isis worshippers to a faith they would not otherwise embrace. Many temples to Isis were, in fact, converted into temples dedicated to Mary. The first clear hints of Catholic Mariology occur in the writings of Origen, who lived in Alexandria, Egypt, which happened to be the focal point of Isis worship.

(2) Mithraism was a religion in the Roman Empire in the 1st through 5th centuries A.D. It was very popular among the Romans, especially among Roman soldiers, and was possibly the religion of several Roman emperors. While Mithraism was never given “official” status in the Roman Empire, it was the de facto official religion until Constantine and succeeding Roman emperors replaced Mithraism with Christianity. One of the key features of Mithraism was a sacrificial meal, which involved eating the flesh and drinking the blood of a bull. Mithras, the god of Mithraism, was “present” in the flesh and blood of the bull, and when consumed, granted salvation to those who partook of the sacrificial meal (this is known as theophagy, the eating of one’s god). Mithraism also had seven “sacraments,” making the similarities between Mithraism and Roman Catholicism too many to ignore. Constantine and his successors found an easy substitute for the sacrificial meal of Mithraism in the concept of the Lord’s Supper/Christian communion. Sadly, some early Christians had already begun to attach mysticism to the Lord’s Supper, rejecting the biblical concept of a simple and worshipful remembrance of Christ’s death and shed blood. The Romanization of the Lord’s Supper made the transition to a sacrificial consumption of Jesus Christ, now known as the Catholic Mass/Eucharist, complete.

(3) Most Roman emperors (and citizens) were henotheists. A henotheist is one who believes in the existence of many gods, but focuses primarily on one particular god or considers one particular god supreme over the other gods. For example, the Roman god Jupiter was supreme over the Roman pantheon of gods. Roman sailors were often worshippers of Neptune, the god of the oceans. When the Catholic Church absorbed Roman paganism, it simply replaced the pantheon of gods with the saints. Just as the Roman pantheon of gods had a god of love, a god of peace, a god of war, a god of strength, a god of wisdom, etc., so the Catholic Church has a saint who is “in charge” over each of these, and many other categories. Just as many Roman cities had a god specific to the city, so the Catholic Church provided “patron saints” for the cities.

(4) The supremacy of the Roman bishop (the papacy) was created with the support of the Roman emperors. With the city of Rome being the center of government for the Roman Empire, and with the Roman emperors living in Rome, the city of Rome rose to prominence in all facets of life. Constantine and his successors gave their support to the bishop of Rome as the supreme ruler of the church. Of course, it is best for the unity of the Roman Empire that the government and state religion be centered in the same location. While most other bishops (and Christians) resisted the idea of the Roman bishop being supreme, the Roman bishop eventually rose to supremacy, due to the power and influence of the Roman emperors. When the Roman Empire collapsed, the popes took on the title that had previously belonged to the Roman emperors – Pontificus Maximus.

Many more examples could be given. These four should suffice in demonstrating the true origin of the Catholic Church. Of course the Roman Catholic Church denies the pagan origin of its beliefs and practices. The Catholic Church disguises its pagan beliefs under layers of complicated theology. The Catholic Church excuses and denies its pagan origin beneath the mask of “church tradition.” Recognizing that many of its beliefs and practices are utterly foreign to Scripture, the Catholic Church is forced to deny the authority and sufficiency of Scripture.

The origin of the Catholic Church is the tragic compromise of Christianity with the pagan religions that surrounded it. Instead of proclaiming the gospel and converting the pagans, the Catholic Church “Christianized” the pagan religions, and “paganized” Christianity. By blurring the differences and erasing the distinctions, yes, the Catholic Church made itself attractive to the people of the Roman Empire. One result was the Catholic Church becoming the supreme religion in the “Roman world” for centuries. However, another result was the most dominant form of Christianity apostatizing from the true gospel of Jesus Christ and the true proclamation of God’s Word.

Second Timothy 4:3-4 declares, “For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths.”

And because i am not bias, i will also show you the FACTS about the Iglesia ni Cristo:

Historically, the Iglesia ni Cristo cannot trace its origin back to the 1st century, because this church is the re establishment of the 1st century church of Christ that we believe had apostatized. It was re established in 1914 (based on the prophecy about the ends of the earth) through Bro. Felix Manalo (we believed to be God's last messenger and not the founder of the church).

Biblically, the Iglesia ni Cristo CAN trace its origin back to the 1st century because the Iglesia ni Cristo or Church of Christ in english is the ONLY ONE CHURCH that Christ established.

The doctrines and practices of the Iglesia ni Cristo CAN trace its origin back to the doctrines and practices of the 1st century church of Christ. There may be some differences because the Iglesia ni Cristo (Church of Christ) today is in the modern times.

The doctrines and practices of the Iglesia ni Cristo CAN trace its origin back to the teachings in the bible.

January 12, 2013

Posible nga bang ang Diyos ay binubuo ng tatlong persona?

Napakadami nilang naimbentong palusot ngayon, este paliwanag sa kanilang 1 Diyos na may tatlong persona, andyan yung kinumpara nila ang kanilang Diyos sa tao daw na binubuo ng katawan, espirito at kaluluwa, andyan din yung kinumpara nila ang kanilang Diyos sa 3 in 1 na kape na binubuo ng creamer, asukal at kape.

Naisip ko, may point naman sila. Pero nag isip ako ng mas malalim, dahil hindi naman ako yung taong bigla na lang naniniwala sa mga nababasa at naririnig ko, inanalize ko...

Ayon na rin sa bibliya, ang tao ay binubuo ng katawan, espirito at kaluluwa:
"May the God of peace himself make you holy in every way. And may your whole being—spirit, soul, and body—remain blameless when our Lord Jesus, the Messiah, appears." 1 Thess 5:23

Kapag ang isa sa mga bumubuo sa tao ay wala o nawala, hindi maaaring mabuhay ang tao, halimbawa may katawan at espirito nga siya wala namang kaluluwa, wala rin yun:

"So, considering that Soul means breath - no, you could not exist on Earth, or anywhere else for that matter, for very long." "Without these forces of life, no, no-one could exist on earth. So you can't exist without a spirit again."
source: answerbag.com

Eh paano kung mawawala ang isa sa mga persona ng kanilang Diyos, magiging DIYOS pa ba ang kanilang DIYOS?

Nung ipinako si Kristo, ano ang nangyari sa kaniya? Di bat namatay? 2/3 days siyang namatay ngunit nabuhay naman siyang mag uli. Tanong, paano kaya nag exist ang kanilang Diyos nung mga panahong namatay o nawala ang isa sa mga persona na bumubuo dito?

Eh kung hiwa hiwalay ang bumubuo sa kanilang Diyos, magiging Diyos pa rin kaya ang kanilang Diyos? 

"As soon as Jesus was baptized, he came up out of the water. Then heaven opened, and he saw God’s Spirit coming down on him like a dove. And a voice from heaven said, “This is my Son, whom I love, and I am very pleased with him.” Matthew 3:16-17

Kung ating iintindihin ang mga verses, may tatlong binabanggit dito: si Kristo, ang Ama, at ang espirito ng Diyos o ang espirito santo. Ang Ama ay nasa LANGIT, ang espirito santo naman BUMABABA GALING SA LANGIT at si Kristo naman nasa LUPA, especificaly nasa ilog ng Jordan dahil kakabautismo lang sa kaniya ni Juan Bautista (baka may pilosopo kasi dyan^^) Tanong, paano kaya nag exist ang kanilang Diyos gayong hiwa hiwalay ang kaniyang persona? 

Paano kaya mag eexist ang tao kung nakahiwalay ang katawan sa espirito at kaluluwa? Paano kaya mabubuo ang masarap na kape kung magkakahiwalay ang creamer, kape at asukal?

Nagets nyo ba ang punto ko?

Ngayon, ang tanong, eto bang Diyos na may tatlong persona ang sinamba ng mga Hudyo sa OLD TESTAMENT? Eto bang Diyos na may tatlong persona ang ang Diyos ni Kristo? Eto bang Diyos na may tatlong persona ang Diyos na ipinangaral ng mga Apostol?

Kung ang sagot ay hindi, saan naman kaya napulot o nakopya ng mga nag imbento ng Trinity doctrine ang aral na ito?

Ano sa tingin niyo?

Ito kaya ay galing sa concept ng Trimurti ng mga Hindu?



The Trimurti (English: ‘three forms’; Sanskrit: त्रिमूर्तिः trimūrti) is a concept in Hinduism "in which the cosmic functions of creation, maintenance, and destruction are personified by the forms of Brahmā the creator, Vishnu the maintainer or preserver and Śhiva the destroyer or transformer," These three deities have been called "the Hindu triad" or the "Great Trinity", often addressed as "Brahma-Vishnu-Maheshwara." 

source: wikipedia

 
Kung hindi sa Trimurti, saan kaya sa mga ito?
Three-headed deities

List of triple deities

Historical polytheism

Eastern religions

New religious movements

source: wikipedia

Napakadami pa lang pagpipilian, at kung mapapansin natin, lahat ng relihiyon pala na may pinaniniwalaang Diyos na 3 in 1 o 3 Diyos ay mga PAGANO, bago pa pala mag exist ang Kristiyanismo ay marami nang mga 3 in 1 o 3 na mga Diyos ang mga tao (na pagano), diba meron ding ganyan sa Kristyanismo? Diyos Ama, Diyos Anak at Diyos Espirito Santo.

Baka naman sabihin ng ilan, WALA SA MGA YAN, IMPOSSIBLE YAN, MALABO YAN!

Talaga?

O sige, pagbigyan na natin, sabihin na nating wala diyan sa napakaraming choices ng origin ng trinity na yan, ano kaya ang pinaka possibleng PINAGMULAN ng imbentong aral na ito?

Sagot: Hellenization. 

Ano ang Hellenization?

"Hellenization (or Hellenisation) is the historical spread of ancient Greek culture or Hellenistic civilization, and, to a lesser extent, language, over foreign peoples conquered by Greece or in its sphere of influence, particularly during the Hellenistic period following the campaigns of Alexander the Great of Macedon. The result of Hellenization was that elements of Greek origin combined in various forms and degrees with local elements." 

source: wikipedia

Ilan ba ang Diyos ng mga Griyego?

Naku, alam na natin ang sagot dyan! Napakadami! Sila bay PAGANO RIN? OO naman!

Ano naman ang kinalaman ng Hellenization sa pag imbento ng Trinity doctrine?

"Hellenistic thinkers, who influenced Christian theologians, had already been attracted by the emphasis in later Judaism on monotheism and transcendence. this tendency was sketched out earlier in Plato and later Stoicism, but it came to its mature development in Neoplatonism in the 3rd centuryA.D. In the first century Philo of Alexandria had interpreted the old testament concept of God in terms of the logos idea of Hellenistic philosophy, but this Hellenization led to a characteristic tension that was to dominate the entire further history of ideas." Encyclopedia

"During the 19th century, protestant historians, notably F.C Baur and Adolf von Harnack, sought to show that the Trinity was a result of "Hellenization of the gospel" while Friedrich Schleiermacher declared that a species of modalism was the only meaningful version of the doctrine. " Encyclopedia

"Initially, both the requirements of the monotheism inherited from the Old Testament and the implications of the need to interpret biblical teaching to Greco-Roman paganism seemed to demand that the divine Christ as the Word or Logos be seen as subordinate to the Supreme Deity. An alternate solution was to interpret the Father, Son and Holy Spirit as three modes of the self-disclosure one God, but not as distinct within the being of God itself." Encyclopedia

“It was when Christianity spread out into pagan world that the idea of Jesus as a savior God emerged.” The meaning of the dead Sea scrolls

Ibalik natin ang tanong kanina, ano ba ang Diyos na sinasamba ng mga Hudyo dati at magpa hanggang ngayon?

The conception of God in Judaism is strictly monotheistic. God is an absolute one indivisible incomparable being who is the ultimate cause of all existence. Jewish tradition teaches that the true aspect of God is incomprehensible and unknowable, and that it is only God's revealed aspect that brought the universe into existence, and interacts with mankind and the world. In Judaism, the one God of Israel is the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, who is the guide of the world, delivered Israel from slavery in Egypt, and gave them the 613 Mitzvot at Mount Sinai as described in the Torah. He also gave the Seven Laws of Noah to all human-kind.

source: wikipedia

Kung ang kinikilalang Diyos ng mga Hudyo ay hindi lang basta isa kundi IISA LANG at ito nga ay ang AMA, bakit hindi sila sinaway ng Diyos at bakit hindi man lang itinuro ng Diyos kay Abraham, Isaac at Jacob na siya ay hindi IISA LANG kundi may tatlong persona? 

Bakit sinasabi lagi sa kanila ng Diyos na walang ibang Diyos maliban sa kaniya at wala siyang nakikilalang ibang Diyos?

 “I am the LORD, and there is no other; Besides Me there is no God I will gird you, though you have not known Me; That men may know from the rising to the setting of the sun That there is no one besides Me. I am the LORD, and there is no other,” Isa. 45:5-6 

“Remember the former things long past, For I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is no one like Me,” Isa. 46:9  

“You are My witnesses," declares the LORD," And My servant whom I have chosen, So that you may know and believe Me And understand that I am He Before Me there was no God formed, And there will be none after Me.” Isa. 43:10  
“Declare and set forth your case; Indeed, let them consult together Who has announced this from of old? Who has long since declared it? Is it not I, the LORD? And there is no other God besides Me, A righteous God and a Savior; There is none except Me.” Isa. 45:21
 
Eh di ba sabi nila, nag eexist na si Kristo kasama ng Diyos pati ng Holy Spirit simula pa noong lalangin ang mundo? Eh bakit hindi man lang sinabi ng Diyos na meron din Diyos Anak at Diyos Espirito Santo para naman naging TAMA man kung saka sakali ang paniniwala nila Abraham at ang mga hudyo tungkol sa TUNAY NA DIYOS? Bakit naman kineklaim ng Diyos Ama na SIYA LANG ANG DIYOS AT WALA NG IBA? 

Sabi pa niya, " Before Me there was no God formed, And there will be none after Me." eh paano na si Kristo at ang Espirito Santo, akala ko ba silay mga Diyos din?

At bakit ba kasi hindi tinuro ni Kristo ang tungkol sa Trinity? Bakit niya sinabi na siyay ANAK NG DIYOS at hindi DIYOS na isa sa mga persona ng Trinity? Bakit niya sinabi na IISA LAMANG ANG DIYOS, at itoy walang iba kundi ang AMA na nasa langit? Bakit si Kristo na Diyos daw ay may Diyos din? 

Sana, itong mga tanong na ito ay makatulong sa pagbukas ng inyong isipan at makatulong sa pagsusuri sa tunay na mga aral na nasa bibliya. Hangad ko na mahanap nyo ang katotohanan lalot napakahalaga na ALAM NATIN at KILALA NATIN ang sinasamba nating Diyos at kung sino ang TUNAY na DIYOS, baka hindi natin alam na ang Diyos palang sinasamba, at kinikilala natin ay MALING DIYOS, nakikitulad tayo sa mga pagano na MARAMI at may IBAT IBANG MGA DIYOS.

January 2, 2013

Pang-aabuso ng MCGI sa copyright act


Kelan ko lang nabasa ang "terms of use" sa website ng Iglesia ni Mr. Soriano, icocopy paste ko na sana yung content dun about restrictions sa copyright para mabasa nyo pero naisip ko baka ireport na naman nila ko, yun na kasi ang latest style nila ngayon sa internet, ang magreport ng mga blogs, websites, facebook accounts and fanpages, youtube videos and accounts at iba pa. 

Hindi tulad dati na ang iingay nila masyado, kung ano anong kasamaang ginagawa nila sa internet sa mga kalaban nilang relihiyon lalo na sa Iglesia ni Cristo at patuloy pa rin naman nilang ginagawa ang masasamang gawain na iyon pero kung ikukumpara natin ngayon, mas kokonti na lang. 

Ipinapaalalahanan ko ang lahat, kahit hindi INC member, na mag ingat sa paggamit sa mga materials galing sa MCGI o kahit materials galing sa ADD members tulad ng links, photos, contents, videos, audios, at iba pa. Dahil kapag nakita nila halimbawa sa iyong blog/website/etc. ang photo ni Mr. Soriano na alam nilang sa kanila galing ay irereport ka nila ng DMCA complaint o Digital Millennium Copyright Act complaint, eto yung version ng Copyright Act sa internet.

Para mas malaman nyo ang tungkol dito, isearch nyo na lang ito sa google.

Para sa akin, wala namang masama kung IREPORT nila ang mga sa tingin nilang umaabuso sa kanilang "terms of use" pero yung magrereport sila ng mga videos o materials na HINDI NAMAN SA KANILA, ITOY ISANG PANG AABUSO!

Siguro alam niyo na ang tinutukoy ko, eto kasing mababait na ADD members ni Mr. Soriano ay nagrereport ng mga videos sa youtube na HINDI NAMAN SA KANILA, kaya yung mga youtube accounts ng mga kapatid ay nasususpend o nadedelete dahil sa mga FALSE COPYRIGHT COMPLAINTS NG MGA ITO.


Ito na ngayon ang kanilang latest na style para patahimikin ang lahat ng kumakalaban sa kanila, katulad ko, nireport nila ang 4 kong articles dito pero nilabanan ko sila, nag submit ako ng counter notification dahil mga PEKE ang kanilang mga complaints. Suspetsa ko rin sila ang may dahilan kung bakit nagsara dati ang blog ng pari na si Mr. Abe na "The Splendor of the Church", at sa mga videos sa youtube, obvious na SILA ANG MAY KAGAGAWAN dahil yung username ng nagreport ay sa mga ADD members.


Paano ang dapat gawin kung nireport ka ng false copyright infringement claim?

Isa lang ang masasabi ko, LABANAN MO! Dahil hindi lang sila ang may karapatan, kundi tayo rin!

Eto ang procedure para sa YOUTUBE

Kapag under sa google ang service na ginagamit mo tulad ng blogger, eto ang para sa GOOGLE

Kung sa Facebook naman, sorry po pero nireremove agad nila o dinedelete yung content at hindi na nila binibigyan ng pagkakataon ang mga nireport ng copyright infringement na makapag counter notification pa.

Para naman sa iba pa tulad ng multiply, isearch nyo na lang po sa google.

Paalala: Seryoso po ang usapang ito dahil batas ang pinag uusapan dito, bago kayo mag counter notification, pag aralan nyo munang mabuti ang tungkol sa DMCA policy ng kung anong service ang ginagamit niyo tulad ng youtube, at isearch nyo rin kung paano ba o ano bang dapat ilagay sa counter notification form.

Kapag naisend nyo na yung counter notification, may mag eemail sa inyo na nareceive na nila ang email nyo, mag aantay kayo ng mga 15 days dahil ito ang palugit nila para sa kung sino mang nagreport na magsampa ng kaso sa korte sa California, pag wala silang natanggap na email na nakapagsampa na ang nagreport sa korte, doon lang nila ibabalik yung naremoved na content sa inyong accounts.

Sabi sa Bibliya: Huwag kang magkumpara!

Marahil ay itanong nyo, bakit ganyan ang title ng post mo readme?

Marami kasing mga tao ngayon ang MAHILIG IKUMPARA ng mga nagagawa o nagawa ng church nila sa mga nagagawa at nagawa ng Iglesia ni Cristo. 

Ako naman, pag nakakabasa ko ng ganito, hindi galit o inis ang nararamdaman ko kundi pagtataka.

Bakit pagtataka?

Kasi itong mga binabanggit ko ay ang mga Catholic defenders, kinukumpara nila ang kung anong meron ang Catholic Church pati mga nagawa nito at nagagawa sa mga nagagawa at nagawa ng Iglesia ni Cristo samantalang ang Catholic Church ay 1900+ years nang andyan at ang Iglesia ni Cristo naman ay mag 100 years pa lang sa 2014.

Sino naman kayang MATALINO at EDUKADONG tao ang magkukumpara sa ilang libong taon nang Church sa church na mag 100 years pa lang ayon sa propesiya ng banal na kasulatan na pagbangon muli ng Iglesia sa huling panahon? 

At kahit ganoon nga, bakit naman IKUKUMPARA ng isang MATALINO at EDUKADONG tao ang mga nagagawa nila sa nagagawa ng ibang church?

Ano to, bilangan ng nagagawa?

Basahin na lang po natin ang kanilang mga post:

By Catholicdefender2000
"Hindi kaya nila naitanong sa kanilang mga MINISTRO kung anong NAIAMBAG ng Iglesia ni Cristo sa pag-unlad ng bawat Pilipino o ng bawat tao sa buong mundo?
Nagkaroon ba sila ng tulad ni Bl. JOHN PAUL II? O katulad ni Bl. MOTHER TERESA ng KALKUTA?
Nagkaroon ba sila ng FRANCIS ASSISI? O  MAXIMILIAN KOLBE? O ang katulad ni LORENZO RUIZ o ni PEDRO CALUNGSOD?

Mayron ba silang mga SCIENTISTS? O mga dalubhasang mga HISTORIANS?

Sila ba ang gumawa ng KALENDARYO ating SINUSUNDAN ngayon sa buong mundo?

Mayron ba silang BIBLE SCHOLARS?  O ENCYCLOPEDIA? O OFFICIAL CATECHISM or TEACHINGS? O OFFICIAL IGLESIA NI CRISTO SITES tulad ng The VATICAN STATE?

Ang bawat LOCAL ba nila ay may OFFICIAL WEBSITE katulad ng mga sumusunod?

Antilles Episcopal Conference

Apostolic Nunciature of China

Association of Member Episcopal Conferences of Eastern Africa

Australian Catholic Bishops Conference

Bishops Conference of Argentina

Catholic Bishops Conference of Bangladesh

Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops

Chinese Regional Bishops Conference

Council of European Bishops Conference

Croatian Bishops Conference

Catholic Bishops' Conference of England and Wales

Federation of Asian Bishops Conference

Bishops Conference of France

German Bishops Conference

Ghana Catholic Bishops Conference

Catholic Bishops Conference of India

Irish Catholic Bishops Conference

Catholic Bishops Conference of Kazakhstan

Kenya Episcopal Conference

Catholic Bishops Conference of Korea

Melkite Greek Catholic Patriarchate of Antioch and all the East of Alexandria and of Jerusalem

Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines

Uganda Episcopal Conference

United States Conference of Catholic Bishops

May contribution ba sila in promoting peace tulad ng Catholic Contribution to International Peace?
O katulad ng Catholic Contribution to the world? O katulad ng Catholic Contribution to the Western Civilization na tumawid sa Pilipinas noong 1521?

Kaya sa mga bagong KAANIB ng IGLESIA NI MANALO na dating mga "Katoliko" mangyari lamang pong alamin ninyo kung anong mga MAGAGANDANG NAIAMBAG ng Iglesiang sinisiraan niyo (at NAKIKINABANG pa rin kayo hanggang ngayon) bago niyo ito husgahan.

And mostly, BAKIT di niyo TANUNGIN ang mga MINISTRO ninyo? Tutal sinasabi nilang sila yung may MARAMING ALAM: ANO ANG NAIAMBAG NG IGLESIA NI CRISTO at ni FELIX MANALO sa kaunlaran ng bawat Pilipino at ng bansang Pilipinas? At ano naman ang  naitulong nito sa buong  SANGKATAUHAN?

By Mr. Abe Arganiosa
Fr. Abe, CRS said...
 

[The Catholic Church have nothing to be proud of]

Really? The great civilizations of the West were achieved with the contributions of the Catholic Church: 
1. Education: The earliest Universities in Europe were established by the Catholic Church. Until now, your New Era University is a piece of junk in comparison with Ateneo, La Salle and University of Sto. Tomas here in the Philippines. In U.S. alone the Jesuits have at least 21 Universities and Colleges. 
2. In Charitable Works: Orphanages, Leprosarium and Home for the Aged were pioneered by the Catholic Church. Even the establishments of Hospitals were copied from the medical centers of charities formed by Catholic Saints who worked to serve the sick free of charge and using their personal resources.
3. In Science, there are many Catholic scientists yet there is no single scientist from the Manalos. Will you please name a Manolista scientist for me? I want to see if they will be at par with Newton, Descartes, Pasteur, Marconi, Volta and other Catholic Scientists. 
4. In Arts, we produced the Michelangelo, Raphael and Da Vinci and countless more. The INC arts are piece of junk in comparison to Catholic Arts. The Vatican Museum houses one of the greatest collections of the greatest Obras and masterpieces in the world competing with Louvre of Paris, Metropolitan Museum of New York and the London Museum. What have you got? Illusions!!! 
5. In Music, the Titans of Music such as Beethoven, Mozart, Bach were inspired by the Catholic Church. How about Vivaldi, Palestrina and others? That is why they composed Missa Cantata and Oratorios still being used for Catholic worship until now. 
6. In Architecture, the designs of Hagia Sophia and our Basilicas and Cathedrals are unmatched by INC. Your so called Temple in Diliman cannot even match the beauty of the bodegas in Sistene Chapel. 
Dream on Anonymous. The Manalos are the one who have nothing to be proud of. We have everything to be proud of......"
source

By Pinoy Catholic



The recent INC Grand Evangelical Mission was able to muster a measly 600,000 in spite of the massive "fetching" of the INC.  They have paid buses to shuttle their members to the Luneta Grandstand. And remember, they are forced to attend which INC members love to call "show of unity". 
This Grand Evangelical Mission is a rare occasion. 
Compare it with this.



A yearly event, this is.  The Feast of the Black Nazarene.

And it gets getting bigger.  The last one, in January 9, 2012, had eight million devotees coming
 
Just comparing. 
Well, all I can think of is that the Nazareno procession is free of charge.  No need to pay your tithes.  While the other one...you get the picture. 
source

At sa isang Catholic defender na nakasagutan ko sa facebook...


By Mark Louie Castor


  • Mark Louie Castor tanong ko lang po bakit wala pong kapilya ng INC o kahit ang Central niyo po na ginawang evacuation center ng mga binaha?

  • Iglesia ni Cristo blog pag sinabi po kasing bahay sambahan, banal na lugar. hindi po palengke at hindi rin po evacuation center. sa loob mismo yung sinasabi ko pero para po sa kaalaman nyo at ng iba may mga pagkakataon na ginagamit ang compound bilang pansamantalang area para sa mga kapatid na nakaranas ng sakuna. yung ibang church po kasi ginagawang palengke at evacuation center, tambayan ng mga adik at mga masasamang loob kahit pa mga pulubi/nanghihingi ng limos at pinagshuhutingan pa ng pelikula ang loob na dapat sanay para sa dyos lang.^^

  • Mark Louie Castor parang wala naman po akong narinig na may isang compound ng INC na ginamit na evacuation center para sa mga nasalanta?

  • Iglesia ni Cristo blog para sa mga kapatid po hindi po para sa lahat ng mga nasalanta. manood po kayo ng CHURCH NEWS sa youtube okaya sa GEM/NET25, nagbibigay din ang INC ng LINGAP SA MAMAMAYAN at nagrerescue din po ang mga maytungkulin samin^^ meron don, nung pansamantala silang pinatuloy sa compound ng INC, binili ng INC agad yung likod na lote para pagtayuan ng pabahay para sa kanila sa pammagitan ng FELIX Y MANALO FOUNDATION.

  • Mark Louie Castor grabe nmn po yung mukha po atang di maganda na exclusive lang ang pagpapatuloy ninyo sa compound ninyo sa pagtulong sa kapwa kundi sa mga kaanib lng po ninyo

  • Iglesia ni Cristo blog tulad nga po ng sinabi ko hindi naman po kasi evacuation ang bahay ng dyos. Kaya ang mga kapatid na nangangailangan ang pinapatuloy pag grabe na talaga. Pag natapos na po yung Philippine Arena, at may malagim na mangyari, yun pwede pa yun gamitin na evacuation pansamantala, pero ang banal na lugar, ang bahay ng dyos kung saan nananahan ang pangalan nya ay hindi po. marami naman sigurong ginawang evacuation centers at area ang pamahalaan para dun at hindi na po sagot ng INC yun^^

  • Mark Louie Castor so ang layunin pala ng INC ay exclusive lng sa mga kaanib, pag di kaanib di na tutulungan? ganun ba yun?

  • Iglesia ni Cristo blog hindi. pero kung yun po ang gustong isipin ng mga di kaanib at pinagpipilitan na ganun nga, katulad nyo, eh wala na po kaming magagawa dyan. ang INC po ay church, hindi po ito FOUNDATION/CHARITY INSTITUTION, pero merong projects ang INC para tulungan ang nonmembers at members, ang LINGAP SA MAMAMAYAN at INC GIVING, at iba pang aktibidad tulad ng mga seminars.

  • Mark Louie Castor ano po silbi ng mga yan sa mga taong walang matuluyan? hyaan niyo na lang sa lansangan? unless kung patuluyin ninyo sa bahay ninyo?

  • Iglesia ni Cristo blog nasagot ko na po ang tanong na yan sir. bakit pinapahaba. o may gusto kayong palabasin. at mangyari?^^ hindi pa ba kayo satisfied sa sagot ko? o may hinihintay kayong isagot ko? share nyo naman! LIKE!^^

  • Mark Louie Castor wala po ako gusto palabasin naawa lang po kasi ako sa mga nasalanta, yung mga walang matuluyan

  • Iglesia ni Cristo blog sa gobyerno po kayo natin magsabi wag po dito dahil church po ito at hindi gobyerno. kung gusto nyo naman po sa ibang church nyo sabihin, yung nagcoconduct ng service para sa mga nasalanta na walang matuluyan, hindi po yung sinasabi nyo sa church na hindi naman nagcoconduct/nagoofer ng service para sa mga nasalanta na walang matuluyan^^

  • Mark Louie Castor grabe hindi po pala charitable at makakristiyano ang church ninyo....manhid sa mga nangangailangan, kung si David nga noong pumasok sa templo nakakain ng Banal na Tinapay na pinagbabawal ang pagkain nito na hindi pari, pero kayo, porke Banal ang Bahay ng Diyos ay di niyo na matulungan ang mga nangangailangan isang di makakristiyanong gawain......anong klaseng pangangaral meron kayo, pangangaral lang sa salita, pero wala sa gawa tulad ng mga Pariseo at Eskriba.......sapagkat nasusulat "Datapuwa't magsihayo kayo at inyong pag-aralan ang kahulugan nito: HABAG ANG IBIG KO, AT HINDI HAIN." (mATEO 9:13)

  • Iglesia ni Cristo blog sabi ko na yan lang pala ang gusto nyong palabasin. sana 1st comment palang yan na ang sinabi nyo. nagpapakaplastik pa kanina, lam ko namang dyan din yan pupunta... hehehe tulad nga po ng sinabi ko, wala kaming magagawa kung yan ang impression nyo sa church namin, na kahit tumutulong ang INC sa iba ay sasabihin nyo pa rin na hindi CHARITABLE ang INC, nasa sa inyo na po yun. wala kaming magagawa sa nagkukunwari ay magtatanong makikipagdebate pala ang gusto.^^

  • Mark Louie Castor debate? excuse me po ang paglalahad po ng saloobin ay hindi debate

  • Mark Louie Castor saka wala po tayong pinag-uusapang doktrina dito


  • Mark Louie Castor saka ako po ay nagtatanong hindi nakikipagdebate,


  • Iglesia ni Cristo blog debate o argumento. hindi po ba tayo nag aargumento?^^ sinabi ko po na tumutulong ang INC sa iba kaso kayo naman pinipilit nyo na hindi, e d nakikipagargumento kayo^^

  • Mark Louie Castor eh kaso di sapat ang tulong na yun, kahit maibsan man lang ang kanilang paghihirap sana


  • Mark Louie Castor pasensya na kapatid, nakahanda na sana ako magpadoktrina sa isa sa mga kapilya ninyo pero sa mga sinagot mo, parang nawalan ako ng gana kasi nalaman ko ang totoo mismo mula sa iyo....kaya di ko n lang itutuloy

  • Iglesia ni Cristo blog ikaw po bahala, ang pagdodoktrina naman po samin ay walang sapilitan, tulad ng pagsunod sa pamamahala pag eleksyon, wala namang sapilitan sa mga bagay na iyan. tungkol sa tulong, e di magsuggest po kayo sa INC administration para sa request nyo, email nyo po kahit sa email add sa pasugo, hindi yung kunwari magtatanong, ang sasabihin lang pala ay hindi kami CHARITABLE at hindi MAKAKRISTYANO, tapos maglalagay ng bible verses para lumitaw na ang church nyo ang tunay na makatao, makabayan at makabasa. wow tula hehehe

  • Mark Louie Castor isang masamang pag-uugali tlga ng INC ang kayabangan

  • Mark Louie Castor ‎, panlalait at paninira sa Iglesia Katolika.......kaya nga masaya ako sa pagiging katoliko ko kasi nakikita ko kung sino ang tunay at kung sino ang hindi tunay........si Kristo kasi mahilig tumulong sa mga nangangailangan kahit sa mga di niya disipulo, ganun din ang unang Iglesia, at lahat yun nakasulat sa Biblia pero yung INC na tatag ni Ginoong Felix Manalo ni isang daliri hindi maigalaw para matulungan ang mga walang matirhan

  • Mark Louie Castor hanggang sa ganda lang ng pangangaral ang mga turo ninyo wala sa substance............hindi makita.......wala palang silbi lahat ng mga nababasa kong magagandang bagay sa PASUGO ninyo...........

  • Iglesia ni Cristo blog Mark Louie Castor, we have freedom of speech. ano pa po ba ang saloobin at paninira ang sasabihin ninyo? okay lang po sabihin nyo na. ang tanong lang ay kung ilan ang maniniwala^^

  • Mark Louie Castor puro lang pala salita siya....halatang di tunay


  • Mark Louie Castor wala nmn ako pakielam kung may maniwala man o wala, I am free to express my sentiments kasi narealize ko ang totoo about sa inyo

  • Iglesia ni Cristo blog Mark Louie Castor, e di lumabas din po ang tunay nyong kulay. kunawari magpapadoktrina tapos masaya pala at debotong katoliko. wow style^^ at ulitin ko po ang INC, na tatag ng ating panginoong hesukristo ay tumutulong sa nangangailangan--> LINGAP SA MAMAMAYAN, INC GIVING. siguro naman ay hindi tayo nagbibilangan ng nagagawang kabutihan. yan po ba ang turo sa Catholic church? magbilangan, e kaya naman pala kayo tumutulong para ipamukha nyo sa iba na kayo ang tumutulong at sasabihin na ang iba ay hindi...

  • Mark Louie Castor nakapasok na ako sa Central ninyo at humanga sa ganda ng buhay ni Ginoong Felix Manalo, pero sa nakikita ko ngaun sa mga sinasabi mo.....parang I doubt n lng yung nakita ko sa Museum....kaya pala wala ako makita sa Museum ninyo na isang update man lang sa charitable works ninyo sa mga nasasalanta ng baha o bagyo

  • Iglesia ni Cristo blog Mark Louie Castor, yes true po you can say whatever bad/good you want to say. at free rin po kayo mag isip ng masama at mabuti sa iglesia ni cristo^^

  • Iglesia ni Cristo blog Mark Louie Castor, wala naman po kasi sa museum yung mga bagay na hinahanap nyo, nasa tv po, nasa CHURCH NEWS, hinding hindi po yun lilitaw sa museum, pero siguro yung LINGAP SA TONDO kung saan nag achieve ng 3 world records, baka makita natin dun sa next nating pagbisita. thanks^^

  • Mark Louie Castor ang tanong nakapunta k n b sa Museum at gallery sa central?


  • Mark Louie Castor wala rin ako nakita sa GEM TV or Net 25


  • Iglesia ni Cristo blog Mark Louie Castor, ay syempre po, nitong year lang nato at marami akong natutunan at nadiscover na wala naman sa internet at sa pasugo^^ kung hinahanap mo yung sa GEM o NET 25, nasa youtube lang. hindi naman ako yayaman sa pagsisinungaling, dahil napanood ko po iyon. type nyo "Iglesianicristo1914" sa youtube channel na yan andun yung video sa CHURCH NEWS nakalimutan ko lang kung kelan yun basta ngayung year.

  • Mark Louie Castor pinapanood ko po yung lahat

  • Iglesia ni Cristo blog Mark Louie Castor, sus, hanapin nyo nga po. eh pag nahanap ko ngayon? magpapadoktrina na kayo sa INC? haha game. 

    source

Kung mapapansin nyo pare parehas po ang tabas ng kanilang mga dila, hindi lang sila ang ganyan kundi marami pa...

Ayoko na pong patulan ang kanilang mga sinasabi, bahala na ang Diyos sa kanila, ikokoqt ko na lang po ang sinasabi ng bibliya tungkol sa kanilang mga ginagawa para naman magising sila sa katotohanan:
"Oh, don't worry; we wouldn't dare say that we are as wonderful as these other men who tell you how important they are! But they are only comparing themselves with each other, using themselves as the standard of measurement. How ignorant!" NLT 2 Cor. 10:12

"Not that we dare to classify or compare ourselves with some of those who are commending themselves. But when they measure themselves by one another and compare themselves with one another, they are without understanding." ESV 2 Cor. 10:12

"Each of you must examine your own actions. Then you can be proud of your own accomplishments without comparing yourself to others." GWT Gal. 6:4

"Pay careful attention to your own work, for then you will get the satisfaction of a job well done, and you won't need to compare yourself to anyone else." NLT Gal. 6:4

"Mag-ingat kayo na huwag gawing pakitang-tao lamang ang inyong pamamahagi sa mga kahabag-habag. Kung magkagayon ay hindi kayo tatanggap ng gantimpala sa inyong Ama sa langit. 
Kaya nga, kapag ikaw ay namamahagi sa mga kahabag-habag, huwag mong hipan ang trumpeta na nasa harap mo, gaya ng ginagawa ng mga mapagpaimbabaw sa mga sinagoga at sa mga daan. Ginagawa nila ito upang sila ay luwalhatiin ng mga tao. Katotohanang sinasabi ko sa inyo: Tinanggap na nila ang kanilang gantimpala. Kung mamahagi ka sa mga kahabag-habag, huwag mo nang ipaalam sa iyong kaliwang kamay kung ano ang ginagawa ng iyong kanang kamay. 
Sa gayon, maililihim ang iyong pamamahagi sa mga kahabag-habag. Ang iyong Ama na nakakakita sa lihim ay magbibigay ng gantimpala sa iyo nang hayagan." Mateo 6:14

Sige na, yung Catholic Church na ang PINAKA SA LAHAT, INYO NA ANG LAHAT, para naman matupad na ang hula sa inyo:

"She gave herself much glory and rich living. Give her that much suffering and sadness. She says to herself, ‘I am a queen sitting on my throne. I am not a widow; I will never be sad.’So in one day she will suffer great hunger, mourning, and death. She will be destroyed by fire, because the Lord God who judges her is powerful." 
"the rulers will be afraid of her suffering and stand far away. They will say, ‘Terrible! How terrible, O great city, O powerful city of Babylon! Your punishment came in one hour!’"

"They will say, ‘Terrible! How terrible for the great city! She was dressed in fine linen; she wore purple and scarlet cloth. She was shining with gold, jewels, and pearls. All these riches have been destroyed in one hour!’ 
Rev. 18: 7-8, 10, 16-17